-
1 предметная инвентаризация
Русско-английский словарь по логистике > предметная инвентаризация
-
2 инвентаризация
Русско-английский военно-политический словарь > инвентаризация
-
3 инвентаризация
Бизнес, юриспруденция. Русско-английский словарь > инвентаризация
-
4 инвентаризация
-
5 предметная инвентаризация
Logistics: progressive inventoryУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > предметная инвентаризация
-
6 Abschreibung
Abschreibung f 1. FIN, RW writedown, depreciation, allowance for depreciation, depreciation allowance (Sachanlagevermögen); amortization (immaterielles Anlagevermögen = intangible fixed assets, insbesondere der Geschäftswert = goodwill; IAS 38); write-off, writeoff (außerplanmäßige Vollabschreibung, non-scheduled depreciation); (BE) capital allowance, writing-off; (AE) allowance for depreciation; 2. GRUND depreciation; 3. WIWI capital consumption, capital consumption allowance* * *f 1. < Geschäft> write-off, transcription; 2. < Grund> depreciation; 3. < Rechnung> amortizement, capital allowance (BE), writing-off, allowance for depreciation (AE), amortization; 4. <Vw> capital consumption, capital consumption allowance* * *Abschreibung
writeoff (US), charge-off, markdown, write-down, (einzelner Posten) item written off, (für Substanzverringerung) depletion, (für Wertminderung) [allowance for] depreciation, amortization, lost usefulness;
• nach Abschreibung aller Verluste after charging off all losses;
• 7b Abschreibung allowance on premises, [statutory] repairs allowance (deduction);
• altersbedingte Abschreibung depreciation for age;
• bilanzmäßig anerkannte Abschreibung balance-sheet depreciation;
• steuerlich anerkannte Abschreibung tax (business) depreciation, tax writeoff (US) (write-off, Br.);
• beschleunigte Abschreibung accelerated depreciation, emergency amortization, rapid writeoff (US);
• betriebsbedingte Abschreibungen plant write-offs (Br.);
• buchmäßige Abschreibung theoretical depreciation;
• degressive Abschreibung declining-balance (reducing balance) depreciation;
• geometrisch degressive Abschreibung double-declining balance depreciation;
• digitale Abschreibung sum-of-the-years digit method (US);
• entstandene Abschreibungen depreciation accruals;
• aufgrund natürlicher Abnutzung erforderliche Abschreibung physical depreciation;
• erhöhte Abschreibungen accelerated allowance (Br.);
• gebrauchsbedingte Abschreibung (Maschinen) wear-out;
• genehmigte Abschreibung allowance for depreciation (Br.);
• laufende Abschreibungen writing-down allowances (Br.);
• lineare Abschreibung straight-line [method of] depreciation (US);
• höchst mögliche Abschreibung maximum depreciation;
• normale Abschreibung ordinary depreciation;
• ordentliche Abschreibung depreciation according to plan;
• progressive Abschreibung sinking-fund method of depreciation (US);
• steuerbegünstigte vorzeitige Abschreibung accelerated allowance (Br.), emergency amortization, rapid writeoff (US);
• übermäßige Abschreibung excessive depreciation;
• verbrauchsbedingte Abschreibung physical depreciation;
• verdiente Abschreibung amount of depreciation earned;
• verkürzte Abschreibung accelerated writeoff (Br.);
• vollständige Abschreibung wholesale writing down;
• steuerlich zulässige Abschreibungen tax writeoffs (US), capital allowance (Br.);
• Abschreibung für Abnutzung depreciation for wear and tear (Br.), wear-and-tear allowance (Br.);
• Abschreibung für Anlagegüter (AfA) annual allowance (Br.);
• jährliche Abschreibung auf das Anlagevermögen capital allowance (Br.), depreciation on fixed assets, annual depreciation (allowance, Br.);
• Abschreibung im Anschaffungsjahr first-year allowance (Br.);
• Abschreibung nach Anschaffungswerten historic-cost depreciation;
• Abschreibung auf Basis der erbrachten Leistung service output depreciation method;
• Abschreibungen auf Betriebsanlagen depreciation of industrial equipment, allowance on plant (Br.);
• Abschreibung auf die Betriebs- und Geschäftsausstattung depreciation on office furniture and equipment;
• Abschreibungen auf Betriebsanlagen und Zubehör plant and material writeoffs;
• Abschreibungen auf das Betriebsvermögen works depreciation;
• Abschreibung vom jeweiligen Buchwert written-down value;
• Abschreibungen für Devisenverluste writeoffs for losses on foreign exchange (US);
• Abschreibungen auf Einrichtungsgegenstände capital allowances on furniture (Br.);
• Abschreibung auf Fabrikgebäude mills and factories allowance (Br.);
• Abschreibung auf Finanzanlagen writedowns and other valuation adjustments of investments;
• Abschreibungen für Gebäude depreciation of buildings;
• Abschreibung auf gewerblich genutzte Gebäude industrial building allowance (Br.);
• Abschreibung auf Gebäudekonto (für Gebäudeabnutzung) reduction of premises account;
• Abschreibungen und Gewinne retentions;
• Abschreibungen plus nicht ausgeschüttete Gewinne business savings, net cashflow;
• Abschreibungen auf Grundstücke real-estate depreciation, depreciation of premises (property owned);
• Abschreibungen auf das Grundstücksvermögen depreciation on land;
• Abschreibungen auf Industriebauten industrial building allowance (Br.);
• Abschreibung für Investitionen investment allowance (Br.);
• Abschreibung von Lagerbeständen inventory writedown;
• hundertprozentige steuerliche Abschreibungen für Maschinen und Betriebsausrüstung im Anlaufsjahr 100% first-year tax relief on new machinery and plant;
• Abschreibung auf den Maschinenpark depreciation on machinery;
• Abschreibung im Rahmen der volkswirtschaftlichen Gesamtrechnung maintaining capital intact;
• Abschreibung auf Rationalisierungsinvestitionen functional depreciation;
• Abschreibungen auf Sachanlagen depreciation on tangible assets;
• Abschreibung für Substanzverringerung (Substanzverzehr, Substanzverlust) depletion allowance (Br.) (expenses);
• Abschreibungen auf Verwaltungsgebäude reductions of premises account;
• Abschreibungen auf Warenbestände inventory writedowns;
• Abschreibung auf Werksanlagen depreciation on plant;
• Abschreibung für Wertminderung allowance for wear and tear (Br.);
• Abschreibung nach Wiederbeschaffungskosten replacement-cost depreciation;
• Abschreibung vom Wiederbeschaffungswert depreciation on replacement value;
• Abschreibung auf Wirtschaftsgebäude agricultural building allowance (Br.);
• Abschreibungen auf die Preise abwälzen to charge depreciation of equipment onto costs;
• Abschreibung aussetzen to interrupt depreciation;
• mit Abschreibungen belasten to charge depreciations;
• zulässige Abschreibung auf das Anlagevermögen berechnen to compute allowance (Br.) (depreciation);
• steuerliche Abschreibungen vornehmen können to gain relief;
• steuerlich zulässige Abschreibungen in Anspruch nehmen to claim capital allowance (Br.);
• als steuerlich zulässige Abschreibung anerkannt sein to qualify for capital allowances (Br.);
• mit Abschreibungen belastet sein to be burdened with charges of depreciations;
• seine Abschreibungen verdienen to earn one’s depreciation;
• Abschreibung [zeitlich] verteilen to allocate depreciation;
• seine Abschreibungen steuerlich über mehrere Jahre verteilen to spread one’s depreciation over several years;
• Abschreibungen vornehmen to write off (down), to charge depreciations, to depreciate;
• steuerlich anerkannte Abschreibungen vornehmen to depreciate for tax purposes;
• Abschreibungen auf Kapitalanlagegüter steuerlich vortragen to carry forward capital allowance (Br.);
• 2% des Hauswertes pro Jahr für Abschreibungen zulassen to compute the writing-down on the basis of 2% per year of the cost of the building (Br.);
• für Abschreibungen zurückstellen to allow for depreciation. -
7 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
См. также в других словарях:
Monadnock Building — U.S. National Register of Historic Places U.S. National Historic Landmark District Contributing Property … Wikipedia
Corrective lens — A bifocal corrective eyeglass lens A pair of contact le … Wikipedia
Romance languages — Romance Geographic distribution: Originally Southern Europe and parts of Africa; now also Latin America, Canada, parts of Lebanon and much of Western Africa Linguistic classification: Indo European Italic … Wikipedia
Fennell Four Phase Model — The Fennell Four Phase Model (FFPM) is a framework for explaining how people who are experiencing chronic illness or trauma can adapt to the changes in their lives. It outlines four phases that people commonly pass through as they learn to… … Wikipedia
George Dern — George Henry Dern 52nd United States Secretary of War In office March 4, 1933 – August 27, 1936 President Franklin D. Roosevelt … Wikipedia
National Register of Historic Places listings in Syracuse, New York — List of the National Register of Historic Places listings in Syracuse, New York Map of all coordinates from Google Map of all coordinates from Bing … Wikipedia
Cherokee language — Cherokee ᏣᎳᎩ ᎦᏬᏂᎯᏍᏗ Tsalagi Gawonihisdi Spoken in United States Region Oklahoma and the Qualla Boundary, North Carolina Native speakers … Wikipedia
Predicted effects of the FairTax — The Fair Tax Act (USBill|110|HR|25/USBill|110|S|1025) is a bill in the United States Congress for changing tax laws to replace the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and all federal income taxes (including Alternative Minimum Tax), payroll taxes… … Wikipedia
Syndrome d'épuisement professionnel — Pour les articles homonymes, voir burnout et épuisement. Syndrome d épuisement professionnel Classification et ressources externes … Wikipédia en Français
Business and Industry Review — ▪ 1999 Introduction Overview Annual Average Rates of Growth of Manufacturing Output, 1980 97, Table Pattern of Output, 1994 97, Table Index Numbers of Production, Employment, and Productivity in Manufacturing Industries, Table (For Annual… … Universalium
Japanese language — Japanese 日本語 Nihongo Nihongo (Japanese) in Japanese script Pronunciation … Wikipedia